The Project to Simplify Everything Just Added Three More Steps

When the quest for ‘frictionless’ data creates physical friction, we must question the true cost of clarity.

Navigating the blue-hued interface of ‘SwiftExpense 3.0’ is like trying to explain the concept of color to someone while they are actively trying to submerge you in a bathtub. I am staring at a progress bar that has been stuck at 73 percent for the last 23 minutes. The cursor is a tiny, mocking circle of spinning white light. This is the new ‘simplified’ workflow.

Workflow Progression (Stuck)

73%

In the chat window of the mandatory training call, which has already dragged on for 43 minutes, a notification pings. It is the facilitator, a man named Marcus who seems to have replaced his personality with a collection of high-resolution stock photos of people pointing at tablets. Marcus is explaining that to submit a £53 taxi receipt… I must tag this £53 expenditure against one of the company’s 3 strategic pillars, assign it to a specific departmental budget sub-code that didn’t exist 3 weeks ago, and link it to a primary OKR from the 2023 roadmap.

The Double Expense

I find myself rehearsing a conversation that never happened, one where I calmly explain to the Chief Operating Officer that if I have to spend 13 minutes categorizing a 10-minute taxi ride, the company has essentially paid for the taxi twice: once to the driver and once in the opportunity cost of my sanity. If data is oil, then this expense system is a massive, leaking tanker and I am the seagull covered in sludge, wondering why I ever tried to fly. The ‘Project to Simplify Everything’ was launched with a 33-slide deck that used the word ‘frictionless’ exactly 13 times.

The greatest threat to a person’s financial health isn’t a lack of math skills, but the presence of administrative friction. She argues that when systems are designed to be ‘legible’ for those at the top, they inevitably become ‘illegible’ for those at the bottom. We are currently living through a crisis of legibility.

– Taylor C.M., Financial Literacy Educator

The Shell Game of Efficiency

Accounting Dept. (Reported)

Highly Efficient

103 Employees (Actual Labor)

~233 Mins / Week

By adding these 3 steps-the Pillar, the Sub-code, the OKR-the organization hasn’t actually simplified anything. They have merely outsourced the labor of accounting to the people who are supposed to be doing the actual work. It is a brilliant, if accidental, shell game. We are all accountants now, just very bad, angry ones.

It’s not incompetence; it’s a fundamental desire for control disguised as a quest for clarity. When a system is truly simple, it is invisible. But an invisible system provides no ‘visibility’ for management. Therefore, the work must be made difficult so that it can be measured.

133 Pages

Complexity is the Tax We Pay for the Illusion of Control.

The Physiological Drain

🤕

My neck is currently locked in a position that suggests I am perpetually searching for a low-flying bird. The stress cascades through the body in ways we rarely acknowledge until we are sitting in a waiting room.

I recently found myself looking into options for hair transplantbecause the recurring tension headaches from these Zoom calls and ‘efficiency’ portals were becoming a permanent part of my identity.

(Administrative friction manifesting physically.)

The Necessity of Redundancy

Taylor C.M. says that ‘true simplicity is the elimination of the non-essential,’ but in a corporate environment, the ‘non-essential’ is often the very thing that proves someone’s job title is necessary. If the expense report took 3 seconds, the ‘Head of Process Optimization’ would have nothing to optimize.

Core Task

3 Seconds

OKR Link

1.5 Minutes

➡️

Sub-Code Tag

2.5 Minutes

Mourning the English Language

I remember one specific instance where I spent 23 minutes trying to find the budget code for ‘Client Entertainment’ only to realize it had been renamed ‘External Stakeholder Synergy Engagement.’ I didn’t even feel angry; I felt a profound sense of mourning for the English language. It was a 13-minute funeral for a word that worked perfectly fine.

Old Term

Client Entertainment

VS

New Code

External Stakeholder Synergy Engagement

They present the limitation-the extra work-as a benefit: ‘Yes, the process takes longer, AND the data is now 33 percent more granular.‘ But for whom?

We Are The Sensors

We have reached a tipping point where the user serves the technology. We are the sensors in a vast machine that is constantly asking us to calibrate ourselves.

43

Clicks

13

Steps Logic

?

Human?

If being a human means valuing time and connection, and being a robot means following a 13-step logic gate to file a receipt, then the ‘Simplified’ project is effectively a mechanization of the workforce.

Transparency as Surveillance

We have replaced trust with ‘transparency,’ but transparency is often just a polite word for surveillance. If you trust me to manage a £3 million project, why do you need me to provide 3 layers of justification for a £53 taxi?

13 Business Days

Processing Time for ‘Successful’ Submission

The Vacuum of Simplicity

Why do we keep adding steps? Perhaps it’s because we’re afraid of what happens when the process stops. It is much easier to fill out 13 fields on a digital form than it is to write a truly original sentence or solve a genuinely hard problem.

Work

3

Pillar

2

Sub-Code

1

OKR

Complexity is a hiding place.

Reflection on Administrative Friction and the Illusion of Control.

By